Re: Make fails on glibc build

2007-05-20 Thread alexander . kahl
Here is a new backtrace from a rebuilt toolchain without optimization and full debugging :) (gdb) bt #0 0xe410 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0x4004d9ba in *__GI_raise (sig=6) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:64 #2 0x4004eff7 in *__GI_abort () at abort.c:88 #3 0x4004709e in *__GI__

Re: Make fails on glibc build

2007-05-19 Thread alexander . kahl
Thanks for the help Jon :) A core was dumped (couldn't be attached because it bounced back) and I tried gdb. The output was: (gdb) bt #0 0xe410 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0x4005091b in raise () from /tools/lib/libc.so.6 #2 0x40051e1e in abort () from /tools/lib/libc.so.6 #3 0x0041 in ?? (

Re: Make fails on glibc build

2007-05-19 Thread Jon Grant
Hi Alexander, Thanks for getting back to us with that backtrace. Unfortunately the debug symbols seem to be missing. I tried to get more info out myself of your core file, but without the CVS binary I just get: Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1". Core was

Re: Make fails on glibc build

2007-05-18 Thread Jon Grant
Hi. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 18/05/07 15:08: I rebuilt it and the error came again. Using make from cvs 20070511, binutils 2.17.50.20070518 from cvs, glibc from cvs 20070518, gcc-4.2.0, kernel 2.6.21.1, i686 (make 3.81 works). Using CFLAGS "-march=pentium4 -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -s"

Re: Make fails on glibc build

2007-05-18 Thread alexander . kahl
7 14:45:09 > An: Alexander Kahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > CC: bug-make@gnu.org > Betreff: Re: Make fails on glibc build > > On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 10:16 +0200, Alexander Kahl wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I was building glibc today and make (newest cvs version) faile

Re: Make fails on glibc build

2007-05-17 Thread Paul Smith
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 10:16 +0200, Alexander Kahl wrote: > Hi, > > I was building glibc today and make (newest cvs version) failed with > > make: file.c:147: enter_file: Assertion `*name != '\0'' failed. > make: *** [all] Aborted Interesting. Of course, the CVS versions of GNU make are not prod

Re: make fails

2001-07-11 Thread Paul D. Smith
This isn't a problem with GNU make. Make just runs your compiler with whatever arguments the makefile says, and it's doing that correctly as far as I can tell. If the compiler can't compile the code, then that's a matter for discussion with the authors of the makefile or the code or, remotely po