Am Dienstag, 14. Januar 2014, 08:12:38 schrieb Paul Smith:
> Can you add the prerequisite to the pattern rules?
>
> %.o : %.c generated.h
> $(COMPILE.c) ...
> %.o : %.cpp generated.h
> $(COMPILE.cpp) ...
>
> This has the definite potential downside that if "generated.h" ch
On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 06:56 +0100, Christian Eggers wrote:
> Am Montag, 13. Januar 2014, 17:20:43 schrieb Paul Smith:
> > On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 22:23 +0100, Christian Eggers wrote:
> > > In Makefile 2 my intention was to state that foo.o depends on some
> > > generated header which must be generate
-Philip Guenther schrieb: -
>Betreff: Re: make doesn't complain if target cannot be built
> In many cases, I've found it completely unnecessary to
> list the source files. Just list the objects that should be built and
> provide pattern rules for the source types
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:56 PM, Christian Eggers wrote:
> Is there a workaround for this? Using explicit rules seems to be difficult in
> my case because some objects are built from .c sources, other from .cpp.
> Is there a better way instead of this:
>
> SOURCES_C := foo.c
> SOURCES_CPP := bar.c
Am Montag, 13. Januar 2014, 17:20:43 schrieb Paul Smith:
> On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 22:23 +0100, Christian Eggers wrote:
> > In Makefile 2 my intention was to state that foo.o depends on some
> > generated header which must be generated first (might be in another
> > rule). But I didn't want to change
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 22:23 +0100, Christian Eggers wrote:
> In Makefile 2 my intention was to state that foo.o depends on some
> generated header which must be generated first (might be in another
> rule). But I didn't want to change the be behaviour if foo.o cannot be
> built because e.g. there's
