"Paul D. Smith" wrote:
>
> Use what you have, and when the new version is available you can switch
> to that. It sounds like what you have done is largely user-compatible
> what I'm doing.
>
Sounds okay. What are you doing btw? ;)
> As for an internal implementation, I think this is essential
%% "Eray Ozkural (exa)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
eo> However, my makefiles have been lying around for more than 2 _months_
eo> since my _rejected_ patch.
There's no reason for you to feel this frustration. That's what open
source is all about; you have the source, you have your patch, it
