Hello!
> Please leave DOS out of this discussion: it doesn't support parallel
> execution (and never will), and therefore output-sync is a no-op there.
Ah, sorry, of course. I forgot... :)
Well, EMX then.
And, anyway, i've refactored the thing a little bit more and now it doesn't
introduce an
On 11/25/2013 01:44 PM, Pavel Fedin wrote:
> I know, this is what i'm going to do. Actually, i want to fix output-sync
> for spawn()-based flavor. This includes EMX, DOS and potentially Cygwin.
> Currently output-sync option will not work in that ports, because the related
> fragment:
> --- cut
> From: Pavel Fedin
> Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 16:44:20 +0400
> Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
>
> Actually, i want to fix output-sync for spawn()-based flavor. This includes
> EMX, DOS and potentially Cygwin. Currently output-sync option will not work
> in that ports, because the related fragment:
> ---
Hello!
> The VMS port is actively and capably maintained by Hartmut Becker. The
> ChangeLog shows he provided VMS fixes for 4.0 as recently as September.
Ah, i see. Thanks for pointing at.
> It's easier if patches are targeted for specific results, so it's best
> not to include major refactor
On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 13:48 +0400, Pavel Fedin wrote:
> I am restarting work on spawn-patch for Cygwin. Actually, i have the very
> first version working, but want to try to do some face-lift and get rid of
> some #ifdef's.
> My first question is: is VMS port maintained, or dead long ago ?
The V
