On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:46:32AM -0500, David Boyce wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:29 AM, Atte Peltomäki wrote:
> > Nice work. Your implementation seems much more refined than mine. Only
> > one thing catches my attention; your version doesn't seem to properly
> > preserve the original line
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:29 AM, Atte Peltomäki wrote:
> Nice work. Your implementation seems much more refined than mine. Only
> one thing catches my attention; your version doesn't seem to properly
> preserve the original line ordering between stdout and stderr. I suggest
> solving this as I did
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 10:24:25AM -0500, David Boyce wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Atte Peltomäki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As you know, running parallel builds with '-jX' makes the shell output
> > difficult to read, since output from parallel jobs are mixed. To remedy
> > this, the use
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Atte Peltomäki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As you know, running parallel builds with '-jX' makes the shell output
> difficult to read, since output from parallel jobs are mixed. To remedy
> this, the use of a buffering shell wrapper has been suggested:
>
> http://cmcrossroads
