> On 15 Sep 2022, at 14:39, Paul Smith wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2022-09-15 at 14:00 +0100, Sam James wrote:
>>> Very preliminary results (only mild testing done so far)
>>> but the only failure I've hit thus far is autoconf-2.71:
>>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/869257.
>>>
>>> I'll continue testing.
>>
On Thu, 2022-09-15 at 14:00 +0100, Sam James wrote:
> > Very preliminary results (only mild testing done so far)
> > but the only failure I've hit thus far is autoconf-2.71:
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/869257.
> >
> > I'll continue testing.
>
> It's been very quiet indeed, which is good news.
Th
> On 9 Sep 2022, at 05:36, Sam James wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 8 Sep 2022, at 22:41, Sam James wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 8 Sep 2022, at 08:12, Paul Smith wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2022-09-05 at 03:47 +0100, Sam James wrote:
I started testing master recently and hit
https://savannah.gnu.org
> On 8 Sep 2022, at 22:41, Sam James wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 8 Sep 2022, at 08:12, Paul Smith wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 2022-09-05 at 03:47 +0100, Sam James wrote:
>>> I started testing master recently and hit
>>> https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?63016
>>> which prevented doing any more testing.
>>
>
> On 8 Sep 2022, at 08:12, Paul Smith wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2022-09-05 at 03:47 +0100, Sam James wrote:
>> I started testing master recently and hit
>> https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?63016
>> which prevented doing any more testing.
>
Hi Paul,
> Hopefully this is fixed. It works for the examples
On Mon, 2022-09-05 at 03:47 +0100, Sam James wrote:
> I started testing master recently and hit
> https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?63016
> which prevented doing any more testing.
Hopefully this is fixed. It works for the examples given anyway.
I also downgraded the required version of autoconf to
On Tue, 2022-09-06 at 18:59 +0100, Sam James wrote:
> When we started testing in Gentoo (not unleashed onto users),
> we had several failures that looks liked this almost immediately.
I see, thanks. I will look at this tonight. Clearly this change
introduces too severe a regression to accept as-
> On 6 Sep 2022, at 15:58, Paul Smith wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2022-09-05 at 03:47 +0100, Sam James wrote:
>> I started testing master recently and hit
>> https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?63016
>> which prevented doing any more testing.
>
> Just curious: why does this prevent doing any more testing?
>
an patching make, but I wouldn't wish that
extra work on Sam.
From: Bug-make on behalf of
Paul Smith
Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2022 07:58
To: Sam James
Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
Subject: Re: New release of GNU make
* EXTERNAL EMAIL *
On Mon, 2022-09-
On Mon, 2022-09-05 at 03:47 +0100, Sam James wrote:
> I started testing master recently and hit
> https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?63016
> which prevented doing any more testing.
Just curious: why does this prevent doing any more testing?
That issue needs to be carefully considered. In the previou
> On 3 Sep 2022, at 23:55, Paul Smith wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> I would like to work on putting out a new release of GNU make. I've
> fixed, or merged patches for (thanks especially to Dmitry) most of the
> issues that I had in mind for this release, except one: I'd really like
> to fix the prob
> I just use `git clean -fdx`
Force, recurse into untracked directories and ignore gitignore so that build
products are deleted. Just the ticket, thanks. README.git mentions "clean"
and "distclean" but not this handy trick.
On Sun, Sep 4, 2022 at 9:53 AM Paul Smith wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2022-09-04 at 00:28 +, Martin Dorey wrote:
> > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/make.git/commit/configure.ac?id=079
> > 3658c09a8f33581dae6dfbe2483ea279e72b1
> >
> > ... imposed a dependency on autoconf 2.71.
>
> I'm not sure if the
On Sun, 2022-09-04 at 00:28 +, Martin Dorey wrote:
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/make.git/commit/configure.ac?id=079
> 3658c09a8f33581dae6dfbe2483ea279e72b1
>
> ... imposed a dependency on autoconf 2.71.
I'm not sure if there's a need for this new autoconf version or not, I
can look at
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/make.git/commit/configure.ac?id=0793658c09a8f33581dae6dfbe2483ea279e72b1
... imposed a dependency on autoconf 2.71. Such is the way of the world, but I
suggest that's worth a mention in README.git, like the dependency on automake
1.16.1 already gets, because th
15 matches
Mail list logo
