Re: Make 3.79 install problem

2000-05-30 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% Johnny Wales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: jw> What about a 'make No_I_Really_Really_Really_Mean_It-install' jw> option, or something along those lines that prints a warning, asks jw> 'Are you sure you wish to do this here zany thing?' then installs jw> to the -proper- (indicated by whic

Re: Make 3.79 install problem

2000-05-30 Thread Johnny Wales
What about a 'make No_I_Really_Really_Really_Mean_It-install' option, or something along those lines that prints a warning, asks 'Are you sure you wish to do this here zany thing?' then installs to the -proper- (indicated by which) location? That'd be good. Reason being: I'm a programmer, so I can

Re: Make 3.79 install problem

2000-05-30 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% Johnny Wales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: jw> Well, looks like the 3.79 install didn't quite work. Yes, it did. jw> I did a configure, jw> make, make install, and everything went off without a hitch. Ah! I've just jw> found the bug. Here's my uname -a: jw> Linux vegas 2.2.13 #1 Tue

Re: Make 3.79 install problem

2000-05-29 Thread Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-
On Mon, 29 May 2000, Johnny Wales wrote: > Well, looks like the 3.79 install didn't quite work. I did a configure, > make, make install, and everything went off without a hitch. Ah! I've just > found the bug. Here's my uname -a: > Linux vegas 2.2.13 #1 Tue Nov 9 00:09:41 GMT 1999 i586 unknown >