> You can probably make a case for either one, but .ONESHELL already
exists, so let's just expand what's already there.
It's also worth noting that .ONESHELL is a recommendation from POSIX.
There's a note in POSIX.2 that says something along the lines of "Recipes
should have been passed to a singl
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 4:56 AM David A. Wheeler
> wrote:
> > Another idea: Enable .ONESHELL to be per-target.
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:47:19 -0800, Britton Kerin
wrote:
> Strongly seconded, I would definitely use this. I've been
> attracted to it many times but never dared try globally.
> Wo
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 4:56 AM David A. Wheeler wrote:
>
> Another idea: Enable .ONESHELL to be per-target.
>
> Problem: According to the docs .ONESHELL is global in effect,
> so using it in an existing makefile requires a lot of rework.
Strongly seconded, I would definitely use this. I've been
