%% <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> You can do this in the next version of GNU make. There is a
>> feature which allows you to declare a dependency for ordering
>> purposes only, but which doesn't impact the rebuild/don't rebuild
>> decision (the update time is ignored).
b> Cool. :) Doe
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Paul D. Smith wrote:
> %% <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> n> if (lookup_file (p) != 0 ||
> n> ((!dep->changed || check_lastslash) && file_exists_p (p)))
>
> I'll look at this more closely.
Thanks. Another thing I forgot: if you ask make to make that target
direct
%% <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
n> if (lookup_file (p) != 0 ||
n> ((!dep->changed || check_lastslash) && file_exists_p (p)))
I'll look at this more closely.
n> Ideally it would be possible to tell make that the date on some
n> targets is never important, rather than using the --o
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Paul D. Smith wrote:
> %% <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> b> dir:
> b> mkdir -p dir/subdir
>
> This rule is incorrectly written. You have informed make that you will
> be creating a target "dir", but you really created a target
> "dir/subdir". As a result, make doesn't
%% <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
b> dir:
b>mkdir -p dir/subdir
This rule is incorrectly written. You have informed make that you will
be creating a target "dir", but you really created a target
"dir/subdir". As a result, make doesn't know anything about
"dir/subdir", it only knows about