Re: Converting make rules into other file formats

2017-10-15 Thread Sven C. Dack
I apologise for the mix up. I've pasted the wrong e-mail address into my response. I meant to say that you will have to be more specific when you ask on help-m...@gnu.org. If you could please continue the conversation there, thank you. On 14/10/17 17:06, Sven C. Dack wrote: ... You will likel

Re: Converting make rules into other file formats

2017-10-15 Thread Eddy Petrișor
Pe 15 oct. 2017 12:57 PM, "SF Markus Elfring" a scris: > Are the chances better to extend the tool “remake” then? … > Probably. Can it be that our software development resources are also too limited for mentioned tasks? I don't know. > My intention was to provide profiling information by

Re: Converting make rules into other file formats

2017-10-15 Thread SF Markus Elfring
> Are the chances better to extend the tool “remake” then? … > Probably. Can it be that our software development resources are also too limited for mentioned tasks? > My intention was to provide profiling information by default … This is generally fine. Do any collaboration challenges hind

Re: Converting make rules into other file formats

2017-10-15 Thread Eddy Petrișor
Pe 15 oct. 2017 12:02 PM, "SF Markus Elfring" a scris: > Before talking about formats and graphical representation, > I advise you to ask if Paul agrees with this kind thing. Are the chances better to extend the tool “remake” then? https://github.com/rocky/remake/wiki Probably. That did not he

Re: Converting make rules into other file formats

2017-10-15 Thread SF Markus Elfring
> Before talking about formats and graphical representation, > I advise you to ask if Paul agrees with this kind thing. Are the chances better to extend the tool “remake” then? https://github.com/rocky/remake/wiki Regards, Markus ___ Bug-make mailing l

Re: Converting make rules into other file formats

2017-10-15 Thread Eddy Petrișor
Before talking about formats and graphical representation, I advise you to ask if Paul agrees with this kind thing. I was personally very disappointed when he rejected the profiling patches I proposed and reworked in the form that made most sense from a practical pov, because he thought even very s

Re: Converting make rules into other file formats

2017-10-14 Thread thutt
SF Markus Elfring writes: > > A Makefile is basically a human-readable text file with instructions > > on how to create executables with a compiler for example. > > How often do you look for a more visual representation of this content? > > > > It has pretty much nothing to do with creating

Re: Converting make rules into other file formats

2017-10-14 Thread SF Markus Elfring
> A Makefile is basically a human-readable text file with instructions > on how to create executables with a compiler for example. How often do you look for a more visual representation of this content? > It has pretty much nothing to do with creating graphics. I got an other opinion. * Do you

Re: Converting make rules into other file formats

2017-10-14 Thread Sven C. Dack
Hello Markus, you've picked the wrong mailing list. The bug-make@gnu.org is a mailing list only for discussing bugs and issues with the make program itself. Please use help-m...@gnu.org for your question. You can subscribe to help mailing list here: https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/hel