OK, I'll look at it.
However, your suggestion of moving the increment to start_waiting_job()
isn't sufficient, because we only want to increment it if we actually
ran something, and we don't know for sure until we get into
start_job_command() whether the command is empty or not (variable
expansio
"Paul D. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> pjl> That is, when the job is being placed on the waiting chain
> pjl> because the load is too high, start_job_command() is never
> pjl> called.
>
> That's not true, though: you didn't examine what happens to those jobs
> _after_ they get put o
%% "Patrick J. LoPresti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
pjl> I have attached a Makefile to the end of this message which
pjl> illustrates this bug.
I will look at the bug, but offhand your description of the code is
missing something important (or, I misunderstood you).
pjl> The problem is t
