> From: Paul Smith
> Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 14:37:29 -0400
>
> > My plan was to write dlopen and dlsym, and add them to
> > w32/compat/posixfcn.c. But I need to understand the semantics of
> > global_dl in order to do that correctly.
>
> It's up to you how you think it be
> From: Paul Smith
> Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 15:15:09 -0400
>
> I think it pseudo-code it would look something like this:
>
> if (posix-shell)
> {
> ...strip out @-+ from LINE...
> }
> #ifdef WINDOWS32
> if (need a batch file)
> {
> ...write LINE
> From: Paul Smith
> Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 16:01:05 -0400
>
> I guess I thought you were writing a batch file,
> then invoking the shell with the batch file name as the command to run.
> E.g., "command.com " vs. "perl " etc. I am naive
> but it seems like that should work
On Sun, 2013-04-28 at 22:41 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > I think the implementation you have is not quite right. I think the
> > parsing of the @-+ stuff is common across all platforms if we have a
> > shell, so you don't need the "else /* non-posix shell */".
>
> I do need a separate code, be
> From: Paul Smith
> Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 15:15:09 -0400
>
> The goal of this code in the if-statement is to implement a special case
> allowing ONESHELL to be easier to add in the case where you DO have a
> standard shell. In that case, and ONLY in that case, we remove
> From: Paul Smith
> Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 14:37:29 -0400
>
> On Sun, 2013-04-28 at 20:19 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > From: Paul Smith
> > > Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
> > > Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 16:58:54 -0400
> > >
> > > On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 23:00 +0300, Eli Zaretski
On Sun, 2013-04-28 at 21:14 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > From: Paul Smith
> > Cc: make-...@gnu.org, bug-make@gnu.org
> > Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 12:54:10 -0400
> >
> > On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 19:17 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > The .ONESHELL feature is now supported on MS-Windows, for the def
On Sun, 2013-04-28 at 20:19 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > From: Paul Smith
> > Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
> > Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 16:58:54 -0400
> >
> > On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 23:00 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > That would be nice, indeed.
> >
> > OK, pushed.
>
> Thanks! But I see you kept g
> From: Paul Smith
> Cc: make-...@gnu.org, bug-make@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 12:54:10 -0400
>
> On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 19:17 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > The .ONESHELL feature is now supported on MS-Windows, for the default
> > Windows shell (cmd.exe) or compatible replacements, in the
> From: Paul Smith
> Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 16:58:54 -0400
>
> On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 23:00 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > That would be nice, indeed.
>
> OK, pushed.
Thanks! But I see you kept global_dl and the call to dlopen with the
1st argument NULL. What is the pur
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 23:00 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> That would be nice, indeed.
OK, pushed. You should be able to simply write a new load_objects()
function and drop it in. Or put it into a w32 file or whatever.
___
Bug-make mailing list
Bug-m
> From: Paul Smith
> Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 15:32:22 -0400
>
> Well, we already maintain a list of modules that are loaded in
> the .LOADED variable. Although it's not written like that today, I have
> no problem changing the code to check that variable to see whether the
I took with make-w32 list off.
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 22:18 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> I added a similar facility to Gawk, but there a problem was much
> simpler, because Gawk itself was tracking the loaded extensions in
> platform-independent code. So my emulation of dlopen didn't need to
> su
> From: Paul Smith
> Cc: make-...@gnu.org, bug-make@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 14:28:18 -0400
>
> On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 20:55 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Note: there's one more major feature in current git repo that needs to
> > be made available on Windows: dynamic loading of extension
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 20:55 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Note: there's one more major feature in current git repo that needs to
> be made available on Windows: dynamic loading of extensions. That is
> my highest priority for Make todo list.
Yes. I wonder if there are features of gnulib which ma
> From: Paul Smith
> Cc: make-...@gnu.org, bug-make@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 12:54:10 -0400
>
> Also, I wonder if you have a few minutes to go through the open Windows
> bugs in Savannah and make a comment or whatever to those which are still
> waiting (some are waiting for other people,
> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:09:51 +0100
> From: "Anjum Naseer"
>
> I have built the 3.82 version of GNU Make using the Microsoft Visual C++
> compiler and it seems to work fine.
> However, I cannot get it to work correctly with the .ONESHELL option.
> I created a dummy makefile (dummy.mak) with t
17 matches
Mail list logo
