On 8/27/19 4:23 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
Paul Smith wrote:
I saw this warning on Windows as well. I seem to recall that this was
done on purpose to pack data structures more tightly, which can save a
lot of memory on large build systems.
However looking at it now I don't think it will actually e
Paul Smith wrote:
I saw this warning on Windows as well. I seem to recall that this was
done on purpose to pack data structures more tightly, which can save a
lot of memory on large build systems.
However looking at it now I don't think it will actually end up saving
any space.
I don't either
On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 12:32 -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Use unsigned int, not unsigned short. Without this patch, c99
> complains ‘warning: nonportable bit-field type’.
I saw this warning on Windows as well. I seem to recall that this was
done on purpose to pack data structures more tightly, whi
