%% Wil Evers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I don't think I'll use this exact patch, since putting 0x3
>> chars on the stack doesn't seem like a good idea... plus the chance
>> that a rule needs 0x1 chars for its prerequisites list seems
>> very small to me.
we> Well, the exac
Hi,
Paul D. Smith wrote:
> I don't think I'll use this exact patch, since putting 0x3 chars on
> the stack doesn't seem like a good idea... plus the chance that a rule
> needs 0x1 chars for its prerequisites list seems very small to me.
Well, the exact amount allocated on the stack is
I don't think I'll use this exact patch, since putting 0x3 chars on
the stack doesn't seem like a good idea... plus the chance that a rule
needs 0x1 chars for its prerequisites list seems very small to me.
But I'll do something so that this function doesn't use alloca() and
fail with larg
Hi,
The attached patch against make-3.80 fixes a mysterious segfault that
occurred when I tried to regenerate a file that dependend on a lot of
other files.
The total length of these prerequisite filenames was somewhat more than
1MB. As it turns out, the use of alloca() for such a large data
