Re: Objective-C patch *ping*

2006-04-20 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 11:31 -0400, Paul D. Smith wrote: > I don't mind adding support for Objective-C. Why is the suffix for an > Obj-C file .m? Weird. Yes, it is .m, you get used to it :) > Please file an enhancement request on Savannah so we don't lose track of > this. Done. Thank you! Pete

Re: Objective-C patch *ping*

2006-04-19 Thread Paul D. Smith
I don't mind adding support for Objective-C. Why is the suffix for an Obj-C file .m? Weird. Well, anyway; I don't think these things belong inside __APPLE__ delimiters, though: Objective-C runs on all kinds of platforms not just Apple. Please file an enhancement request on Savannah so we don't

Re: Objective-C patch *ping*

2006-04-19 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Hi, Any comments on this? Peter signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-m

Objective-C patch

2006-04-09 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Hi, I took the patch at http://darwinsource.opendarwin.org/10.4.5.x86/gnumake-110/patches/patch-default.c added preprocessor checks for __APPLE__ and removed the hack for the NeXT IDE. There have been a few compliants on Apple lists about the lack of Objective-C support in non-Apple versions of GNU