[bug #52267] No rule to make target, when re-including file after being generated

2022-08-02 Thread Paul D. Smith
Update of bug #52267 (project make): Status:None => Duplicate Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #1: This is a duplicate of

What causes "No rule to make target 'crypto/(0x55ae24c35998).o'"

2020-03-12 Thread Jeffrey Walton
-modules\"" -DNDEBUG -D_ _ANDROID_API__=26 -MMD -MF apps/lib/libapps-lib-s_socket.d.tmp -MT apps/lib/liba pps-lib-s_socket.o -c -o apps/lib/libapps-lib-s_socket.o apps/lib/s_socket.c make[1]: *** No rule to make target 'crypto/(0x55ae24c35998).o', needed by 'libcrypto.a'

[bug #52267] No rule to make target, when re-including file after being generated

2017-10-23 Thread Koen Van Hoof
URL: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?52267> Summary: No rule to make target, when re-including file after being generated Project: make Submitted by: kvho Submitted on: Mon 23 Oct 2017 11:24:53 AM CEST Sever

Re: Adding line numbers to output for "No rule to make target"

2015-11-27 Thread Jonny Grant
On 27/11/15 17:58, th...@vmware.com wrote: Jonny Grant writes: > > If you do it that way, now you've got two different formats for the > > same message. This can be confusing to users, and certainly > > complicates factors if there is software sitting on top of Make and > > ope

Re: Adding line numbers to output for "No rule to make target"

2015-11-27 Thread thutt
Jonny Grant writes: > > If you do it that way, now you've got two different formats for the > > same message. This can be confusing to users, and certainly > > complicates factors if there is software sitting on top of Make and > > operating on the messages (continuous integration / au

Re: Adding line numbers to output for "No rule to make target"

2015-11-26 Thread Jonny Grant
On 26/11/15 00:04, th...@vmware.com wrote: Jonny Grant writes: > > > On 25/11/15 13:59, th...@vmware.com wrote: > > Jonny Grant writes: > > > Hello > > > > > > Could line numbers be added to output for the case where it says

Re: Adding line numbers to output for "No rule to make target"

2015-11-25 Thread thutt
Jonny Grant writes: > > > On 25/11/15 13:59, th...@vmware.com wrote: > > Jonny Grant writes: > > > Hello > > > > > > Could line numbers be added to output for the case where it says "No > > > rule to make targe

Re: Adding line numbers to output for "No rule to make target"

2015-11-25 Thread Jonny Grant
On 25/11/15 13:59, th...@vmware.com wrote: Jonny Grant writes: > Hello > > Could line numbers be added to output for the case where it says "No > rule to make target" please? > > Example below. GNU Make 4.1 > > I'm not on this list, so

Adding line numbers to output for "No rule to make target"

2015-11-25 Thread thutt
Jonny Grant writes: > Hello > > Could line numbers be added to output for the case where it says "No > rule to make target" please? > > Example below. GNU Make 4.1 > > I'm not on this list, so please include my email address is any > replies Regar

Adding line numbers to output for "No rule to make target"

2015-11-25 Thread Jonny Grant
Hello Could line numbers be added to output for the case where it says "No rule to make target" please? Example below. GNU Make 4.1 I'm not on this list, so please include my email address is any replies Regards, Jonny makefile.mak %.o : %.d all: test.o echo processing

No rule to make target

2015-04-11 Thread Bruce Korb
I am getting this message: make[2]: *** No rule to make target `dep-gnu-pw-mgr.1', needed by `gnu-pw-mgr.1'. Stop. make[2]: Leaving directory `/u/gnu/proj/gnu-pw-mgr-bld/doc' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 Seems like a real neophyte problem, but this neophyte has a prob

Re: No rule to make target

2015-04-11 Thread Bruce Korb
On 04/11/15 11:25, Bruce Korb wrote: I am getting this message: Never mind. I was playing with "$(call ...)" stuff and the text was permuted in an unexpected way...Sorry. ___ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/list

No rule to make target simulator debug

2013-06-03 Thread Ashish Gour
hi, i am developing the pjsip application for bb 10. after building the code i am facing the error : no rule to make target simulator debug stop.. plzzz help me.. thanks in advance ___ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org

[bug #18435] no rule to make target whose name contains close parenthesis

2009-06-13 Thread Paul D. Smith
Update of bug #18435 (project make): Status:None => Fixed Assigned to:None => psmith Open/Closed:Open => Closed Fixed Release:

Re: Wrong error message 'No rule to make target' instead of 'makefile not found'

2009-04-01 Thread Paul Smith
; The command (1) > make elf > gives the result "make: *** No rule to make target `elf'. Stop." > when no makefile exists. > > The command (2) > make -f mmm aaa > gives the result > make: mmm: No such file or directory > make: *** No rule to make tar

Wrong error message 'No rule to make target' instead of 'makefile not found'

2009-04-01 Thread bestellrep1
Please keep my email-address confidential, as I don't want to get spam. The command (1) make elf gives the result "make: *** No rule to make target `elf'. Stop." when no makefile exists. The command (2) make -f mmm aaa gives the result make: mmm: No such file or dire

Re: % vs. "No rule to make target"

2008-06-09 Thread jidanni
PS> what does this information do for you? I don't know, all I am thinking is hooks (i.e., differing error messages that can be post processed by:) for a future hand holding system so one can "ask what went wrong?" And have super basic tutorial information given... (target implementation date 2050

Re: % vs. "No rule to make target"

2008-06-09 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 01:49 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Do differentiate error messages from different triggers, I'm not sure this is fruitful, but to reiterate: there are no different triggers. There is one procedure. It looks something like this (100% psuedo code): rule *r;

Re: % vs. "No rule to make target"

2008-06-09 Thread jidanni
Do differentiate error messages from different triggers, all in preparation for a perl-like See perldiag for explanations of all Perl's diagnostics. The "use diagnostics" pragma automatically turns Perl's normally terse warnings and errors into these longer forms. hand holding facility for

Re: % vs. "No rule to make target"

2008-06-09 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 12:02 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Maybe whatever prints messages prefixed by >make: *** No rule to make target > is called from several different points in the code, and could give > finer grained messages, all still on one line. > > Maybe the

Re: % vs. "No rule to make target"

2008-06-08 Thread jidanni
PS> I don't understand the distinction you're making here between "no rule PS> at all" and "no best rule" (what's a "best rule"?), and just "no rule". Maybe whatever prints messages prefixed by make: *** No rule to make target is cal

Re: % vs. "No rule to make target"

2008-06-08 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 11:28 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > OK, OK, is perhaps this message, > make: *** No rule to make target `z', needed by `a'. Stop. > is actually triggered by several different conditions, and could > instead be refashioned into several mo

Re: % vs. "No rule to make target"

2008-06-08 Thread jidanni
OK, OK, is perhaps this message, make: *** No rule to make target `z', needed by `a'. Stop. is actually triggered by several different conditions, and could instead be refashioned into several more exact messages, e.g., no rule at all, no best

Re: % vs. "No rule to make target"

2008-06-06 Thread Paul Smith
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 19:49 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > All is well: > $ cat Makefile > all:z.bak > %.bak:; > $ make > make: Nothing to be done for `all'. > Until we add a %: > $ cat Makefile > all:z.bak > %.bak:%; > $ make >

Re: % vs. "No rule to make target"

2008-06-06 Thread Philip Guenther
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 5:49 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All is well: > $ cat Makefile > all:z.bak > %.bak:; > $ make > make: Nothing to be done for `all'. > Until we add a %: > $ cat Makefile > all:z.bak > %.bak:%; > $ make > make: ***

% vs. "No rule to make target"

2008-06-06 Thread jidanni
All is well: $ cat Makefile all:z.bak %.bak:; $ make make: Nothing to be done for `all'. Until we add a %: $ cat Makefile all:z.bak %.bak:%; $ make make: *** No rule to make target `z.bak', needed by `all'. Stop. Suddenly it can't find the rule anymore.

[bug #18435] no rule to make target whose name contains close parenthesis

2006-12-01 Thread Martin Dorey
URL: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?18435> Summary: no rule to make target whose name contains close parenthesis Project: make Submitted by: mdorey Submitted on: Friday 12/01/2006 at 18:52 Severity: 3 -