Hi Paul,
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 01:02:37AM -0500, Paul D. Smith wrote:
> I'm not ready to release it for testing yet.
>
All right. :}
> You are, of course, free to do what you like, but my previous suggestion
> is still the best one I have. You have a simple implementation that
> works for y
%% Eray Ozkural <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
eo> Paul, how much of this is done and is available? If you haven't
eo> written anything yet I'd like to take over this task and implement
eo> it. What do you think?
I have done a good bit. It's wrapped up with some general
cleanup/enhancement t
Hi,
Previously we'd discussed that in order to implement a portable
eval (or interpret as I'd called it) read.c needs some mods.
Now, I've looked over stream calls in make and it doesn't seem
all that difficult to replace them with wrapper routines that
know how to handle portable string streams.
