%% "Martin Dorey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I thought it wasn't until NFSv4 they were supported but I guess it was
>> NFSv3.
md> NFSv2 supported microsecond resolution (search for "useconds" in
md> http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1094.html). I've got a feeling that
md> you're right, t
On Behalf Of Paul D. Smith
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 11:08
To: Martin Dorey
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; bug-make@gnu.org
Subject: RE: GNU Make 3.80 problem on Solaris 8
%% "Martin Dorey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> NFS filesystems (at least not NFSv2 or NFSv3) don't s
Ok, well our nfs server supports it. This was all done on an nfs mounted file
system. We just got this new server a few weeks ago.
I then tried the test on an older server file system. It all works properly
there.
So I assume you will need to know some information. If so please let me know
wha
%% "Martin Dorey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> NFS filesystems (at least not NFSv2 or NFSv3) don't support sub-second
>> timestamps
md> That's definitely not true. NFSv3 supports nanosecond timestamp
md> resolution. This isn't just a theoretical capability. I'm
md> looking at a fi
utlook, BlueArc Engineering
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
D. Smith
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 6:27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
Subject: Re: GNU Make 3.80 problem on Solaris 8
%% Warren L Dodge <[EMAIL PROTECT
%% Warren L Dodge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
wld> Ok, well our nfs server supports it. This was all done on an nfs
wld> mounted file system. We just got this new server a few weeks ago.
Nice.
wld> So I assume you will need to know some information.
Nope, not really. I believe you :-).
%% Warren L Dodge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
wld> I can't believe this is the first time we have noticed this in
wld> the two years we have been using 3.80.
One thing to note is that NFS filesystems (at least not NFSv2 or NFSv3)
don't support sub-second timestamps. So, building on an NFS fi
Thanks for the help.
I can't believe this is the first time we have noticed this in the two years
we have been using 3.80.
___
Bug-make mailing list
Bug-make@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
%% Warren L Dodge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
wld> We are having a problem with GNU Make 3.80 on our Solaris 8
wld> system. When using the same verion of GNU Make on a GNU Linux
wld> system if works fine.
wld> It was pointed out to me that an old copy of GNU make-3.70 worked
wld> fine.
We are having a problem with GNU Make 3.80 on our Solaris 8 system. When
using the same verion of GNU Make on a GNU Linux system if works fine.
It was pointed out to me that an old copy of GNU make-3.70 worked
fine. Indeed it does. I took the source for the 3.70 and comiled them the
same way I
10 matches
Mail list logo
