Re: Converting make rules into other file formats

2017-10-15 Thread Sven C. Dack
I apologise for the mix up. I've pasted the wrong e-mail address into my response. I meant to say that you will have to be more specific when you ask on help-m...@gnu.org. If you could please continue the conversation there, thank you. On 14/10/17 17:06, Sven C. Dack wrote: ... You will likel

Re: Converting make rules into other file formats

2017-10-15 Thread Eddy Petrișor
Pe 15 oct. 2017 12:57 PM, "SF Markus Elfring" a scris: > Are the chances better to extend the tool “remake” then? … > Probably. Can it be that our software development resources are also too limited for mentioned tasks? I don't know. > My intention was to provide profiling information by

Re: Converting make rules into other file formats

2017-10-15 Thread SF Markus Elfring
> Are the chances better to extend the tool “remake” then? … > Probably. Can it be that our software development resources are also too limited for mentioned tasks? > My intention was to provide profiling information by default … This is generally fine. Do any collaboration challenges hind

Re: Converting make rules into other file formats

2017-10-15 Thread Eddy Petrișor
Pe 15 oct. 2017 12:02 PM, "SF Markus Elfring" a scris: > Before talking about formats and graphical representation, > I advise you to ask if Paul agrees with this kind thing. Are the chances better to extend the tool “remake” then? https://github.com/rocky/remake/wiki Probably. That did not he

Re: Converting make rules into other file formats

2017-10-15 Thread SF Markus Elfring
> Before talking about formats and graphical representation, > I advise you to ask if Paul agrees with this kind thing. Are the chances better to extend the tool “remake” then? https://github.com/rocky/remake/wiki Regards, Markus ___ Bug-make mailing l

Re: Converting make rules into other file formats

2017-10-15 Thread Eddy Petrișor
Before talking about formats and graphical representation, I advise you to ask if Paul agrees with this kind thing. I was personally very disappointed when he rejected the profiling patches I proposed and reworked in the form that made most sense from a practical pov, because he thought even very s

Re: Converting make rules into other file formats

2017-10-14 Thread thutt
SF Markus Elfring writes: > > A Makefile is basically a human-readable text file with instructions > > on how to create executables with a compiler for example. > > How often do you look for a more visual representation of this content? > > > > It has pretty much nothing to do with creating

Re: Converting make rules into other file formats

2017-10-14 Thread SF Markus Elfring
> A Makefile is basically a human-readable text file with instructions > on how to create executables with a compiler for example. How often do you look for a more visual representation of this content? > It has pretty much nothing to do with creating graphics. I got an other opinion. * Do you

Re: Converting make rules into other file formats

2017-10-14 Thread Sven C. Dack
Hello Markus, you've picked the wrong mailing list. The bug-make@gnu.org is a mailing list only for discussing bugs and issues with the make program itself. Please use help-m...@gnu.org for your question. You can subscribe to help mailing list here: https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/hel

Converting make rules into other file formats

2017-10-14 Thread SF Markus Elfring
Hello, How does the current software situation look like for the conversion of data from make scripts into file formats with which other users are more familiar? Examples: * Outlines * Vector graphics Would you like to point any special development tools out? Regards, Markus ___