Hi guys;
Thanks for your mention of, and interest in, the licensing issues with
the manual; I didn't notice them before. I'm currently discussing the
situation on the GNU developers' mailing list and I'm getting the
official FSF line on these details and will change the wording in the
manual acco
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
1) Version b) lists the ``GNU General Public License'' as an Invariant
Section, but does not actually include it.
It should mention the GFDL section (which _is_ included) instead.
That would be redundant, because the GFDL text has to be included
anyway. There is no n
> Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:14:49 +0200
> From: Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> 1) Version b) lists the ``GNU General Public License'' as an Invariant
> Section, but does not actually include it.
It should mention the GFDL section (which _is_ included) instead. I'm
guessing that when th
There are two different license texts given at the beginning of
doc/make.texi:
a)
,
| Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
| under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1 or
| any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; w
