Re: Change in $(MFLAGS) format breaks automake-generated rules

2013-05-01 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Hi Paul. On 05/01/2013 08:26 AM, Paul Smith wrote: > On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 00:59 +0200, Stefano Lattarini wrote: >># With make 3.82, compiled from official tarball: >>$ make -f- <<<'all:; @echo $(MFLAGS)' -I none >>-I none >> >># With development version of make: >>$ make -f- <

Re: Change in $(MFLAGS) format breaks automake-generated rules

2013-04-30 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 00:59 +0200, Stefano Lattarini wrote: ># With make 3.82, compiled from official tarball: >$ make -f- <<<'all:; @echo $(MFLAGS)' -I none >-I none > ># With development version of make: >$ make -f- <<<'all:; @echo $(MFLAGS)' -I none >-Inone I think MFLA

Change in $(MFLAGS) format breaks automake-generated rules

2013-04-30 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Few automake-generated recipes have the necessity to determine at runtime whether a particular make mode/option is active (e.g., '-k' or '-n'). To do so, they analyze the content of the $(MFLAGS) make variable. But the exact format of this variable has been changed in the development version of G