On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 04:09 -0400, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Might as well bring some glibc expert on board for this discussion.
> (Sorry, I don't have a recommendation who might that be.) They could
> put the glibc behavior into perspective, and also advise about other
> implementations of `glob'.
> From: Paul Smith
> Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 02:01:03 -0400
> Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
> Reply-To: psm...@gnu.org
>
> Less obvious is which of the various ways it could be fixed is the right
> way. Should we stop "cleaning" these paths altogether, to work around
> the bug in glibc glob()? I think if
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 00:46 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> > //%: //%
> > @echo oops!
>
> When I run this with GNU make 3.80, I get this error:
>
> make: Circular /tmp/x1.mk <- /tmp/x1.mk dependency dropped.
>
> Is that what you mean by "normal"?
>
> I do agree that something is bro
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 16:07 -0400, Aleksey Yakovlev wrote:
> Please take a look at my posting #4:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/gnu.utils.bug/browse_thread/thread/e23e2352bf6f8a91?hl=en#
It would work out better to use this list. Here's the message I guess
you mean:
> It looks like the mak
Please take a look at my posting #4:
http://groups.google.com/group/gnu.utils.bug/browse_thread/thread/e23e2352bf6f8a91?hl=en#
Thanks
Aleksey
___
Bug-make mailing list
Bug-make@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
