On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 11:16:44AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 22:49:31 -0400
>> From: Christopher Faylor
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 08:02:54PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> >> Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:52:58 -0500
>> >> From: Norbert Thiebaud
>> >> Cc: Pavel Fedin ,
> Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 22:49:31 -0400
> From: Christopher Faylor
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 08:02:54PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >> Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:52:58 -0500
> >> From: Norbert Thiebaud
> >> Cc: Pavel Fedin , bug-make@gnu.org
> >>
> >> fork() is a very expensive operation in c
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 09:47:27AM +0400, Pavel Fedin wrote:
> Hello!
>
>> Can you at least tell when (year and month) this discussion took place?
>
> I was able to find only this in ML archive:
>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-01/msg00113.html
> The rest of discussion was held in private email. F
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 08:02:54PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:52:58 -0500
>> From: Norbert Thiebaud
>> Cc: Pavel Fedin , bug-make@gnu.org
>>
>> fork() is a very expensive operation in cygwin.
>
>Yes, I know. But without it, some things that are expected of a Posix
>
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 02:42:23PM +0400, Pavel Fedin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Please take this patch, Cygwin team told that they would like to integrate
>with upstream. I have already posted it some time ago but got no reply.
> The patch significantly improves performance of Make under Cygwin.
Actuall
Hello!
> Can you at least tell when (year and month) this discussion took place?
I was able to find only this in ML archive:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-01/msg00113.html
The rest of discussion was held in private email. For some weird reason
patch mails were rejected as spam by Cygwin ML,
Hello!
Ø Using EMX is a shortcut to achieve the usage of spawn() over fork(). It
might not be the cleanest choice but it works. Maybe Pavel finds the time to
make the patch distinct to cygwin itself.
What do you mean exactly by this ?
Unfortunately i really dont have much time to work on
> Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 01:24:45 +0400
> From: Pavel Fedin
> Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
>
> There was a short discussion in Cygwin ML with test results, sorry, i
> cannot find the URL, Google fails to find it.
Can you at least tell when (year and month) this discussion took
place?
In any case, I th
Dear Eli Zaretskii!
On Tue, 30 Jul 2013 18:39:10 +0300 you wrote:
> Is there any discussion we could read about that with the details of
> the problem and how/why does the proposed patch solves it?
The goal of this is exactly what is stated - improve performance.
fork() is extremely slow opera
> Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:52:58 -0500
> From: Norbert Thiebaud
> Cc: Pavel Fedin , bug-make@gnu.org
>
> fork() is a very expensive operation in cygwin.
Yes, I know. But without it, some things that are expected of a Posix
behavior will not work. A notable example is that the child process
in
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Pavel Fedin
>> Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 14:42:23 +0400
>>
>> Please take this patch, Cygwin team told that they would like to integrate
>> with upstream. I have already posted it some time ago but got no reply.
>> The patch significa
Hi...
bug-make-bounces+roland.schwingel=onevision@gnu.org wrote on
30.07.2013 18:37:35:
> On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 18:39 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > In general, I feel it's wrong to do this: Cygwin is a Posix platform,
> > so it should be using the Posix code, to be as compatible with other
Hi Eli...
Eli Zaretskii wrote on 30.07.2013 18:29:53:
> From: Eli Zaretskii
> To: Roland Schwingel
> Cc: bug-make@gnu.org, p.fe...@samsung.com
> Date: 30.07.2013 18:32
> Subject: Re: [PATCH1/2] Use spawn() on Cygwin
>
> > Cc: bug-make@gnu.org, Pavel Fedin
&g
On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 18:39 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> In general, I feel it's wrong to do this: Cygwin is a Posix platform,
> so it should be using the Posix code, to be as compatible with other
> Posix platforms as possible. EMX is not a Posix platform, so using
> its code will likely make th
> Cc: bug-make@gnu.org, Pavel Fedin
> From: Roland Schwingel
> Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 18:12:55 +0200
>
> I am using Pavels patch for some months now in my private version of
> gnumake on cygwin heavily and I could not find any regression with it up
> to now and gnumake is in my use cases clear
Hi...
bug-make-bounces+roland.schwingel=onevision@gnu.org wrote on
30.07.2013 17:39:10:
> > From: Pavel Fedin
> > Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 14:42:23 +0400
> >
> > Please take this patch, Cygwin team told that they would like to
integrate
> > with upstream. I have already posted it some time
> From: Pavel Fedin
> Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 14:42:23 +0400
>
> Please take this patch, Cygwin team told that they would like to integrate
> with upstream. I have already posted it some time ago but got no reply.
> The patch significantly improves performance of Make under Cygwin.
Thanks.
Is
Hello!
Please take this patch, Cygwin team told that they would like to integrate
with upstream. I have already posted it some time ago but got no reply.
The patch significantly improves performance of Make under Cygwin.
Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research ce
18 matches
Mail list logo
