Hello!
> Done.
Thank you very much!
> My take on this is that I need to see the refactoring to say something
> intelligent about it.
Ok, of course. :)
Currently i have some high-priority problems here, when i have more time
i'll get back to it and of course post the patch.
Kind regards,
Pa
> From: Pavel Fedin
> Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:03:38 +0400
>
> > Thanks, this variant is fine with me.
>
> Good. I'm waiting for it to be committed
Done.
> In order to make it switched at runtime, i would like to refactor
> child_execute_job(). I have suggested this e
Hello!
> Thanks, this variant is fine with me.
Good. I'm waiting for it to be committed, since i would like to go on with
merging spawn-patch.
In order to make it switched at runtime, i would like to refactor
child_execute_job(). I have suggested this earlier, nobody replied.
Kind regards,
Pa
> From: Pavel Fedin
> Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:23:58 +0400
>
> I have rechecked. Actually NO_OUTPUT_SYNC is defined only by handmade
> config.h files for DOS, VMS and Amiga. EMX uses configure script, so
> NO_OUTPUT_SYNC will not be defined.
> However, indeed, there is ra
Hello!
> Thanks, but does EMX support output-sync? If not, this fragment:
>
> + /* Divert child output if output_sync in use. */
> + if (child->output.syncout)
> +{
> + if (child->output.out >= 0)
> +outfd = child->output.out;
> + if