On Thu, 2022-01-13 at 23:31 +0100, Jouke Witteveen wrote:
> I would like to draw attention to this patch again, since without
> it the intcmp function is misbehaving.
Thanks for reminding me: somehow the original got deleted from my inbox
without being applied. I've now applied it to my Git repo
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 8:24 PM Jouke Witteveen wrote:
>
> * src/function.c (parse_textint): Fix nonzero detection.
> * tests/scripts/functions/intcmp: Extend test coverage.
> ---
>
> The `*p++ == '0'` test should have been `*p++ != '0'` and did not need
> to be repeated for every digit anyway. B
* src/function.c (parse_textint): Fix nonzero detection.
* tests/scripts/functions/intcmp: Extend test coverage.
---
The `*p++ == '0'` test should have been `*p++ != '0'` and did not need
to be repeated for every digit anyway. By pure luck, all numbers used
in tests included a digit '0', so this
