On Mon, 2024-12-09 at 17:18 -0800, Pete Dietl wrote:
> Here is a bit of test code I came up with. Do you think this is
> necessary and or the right approach for testing with extreme values
> of double and long long?
I think the idea of setting values in config-flags.pm.in is correct,
just to keep
* Poke *
On Mon, Dec 9, 2024, 5:18 PM Pete Dietl wrote:
> I could also use some help with autotools and the Perl test scripts <
> I am a novice at both :) >
>
> Here is a bit of test code I came up with. Do you think this is
> necessary and or the right approach for testing with extreme values o
I could also use some help with autotools and the Perl test scripts <
I am a novice at both :) >
Here is a bit of test code I came up with. Do you think this is
necessary and or the right approach for testing with extreme values of
double and long long?
>From 4a6e84061fbf2180cf4efec45a215dd8af648
On Mon, 2024-12-09 at 01:49 -0800, Pete Dietl wrote:
> Mon, 9 Dec 2024 10:37:14 +0100, Jouke Witteveen wrote:
> > What I remember from the original thread is that we first needed a
> > good proposal. I'm afraid the existence of the implementation
> > suggested now sidesteps the discussion on what f
Jouke,
Wed, 20 May 2020 13:42:11 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> > Another option would be to introduce some new syntax like $(()),
> > but that might break existing Makefiles and would probably be more
> > work, though it looks cleaner IMO.
> No, I don't agree with that. Trying to change the base ma
On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 12:11 AM Paul Smith wrote:
> I reviewed the previous (lengthy) email thread before looking at this
> patch.
I guess you mean the thread that at some point was titled "math
expressions" [1].
Was there any conclusion there? At some point it gravitated to a
shell/Posix-style e
rom: Pete Dietl
> > Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 03:57:06 -0800
> > Subject: [PATCH] Add arithmetic builtin functions
> >
> > ---
> > src/function.c | 401
> > -
> > 1 file changed, 400 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-
l wrote:
> From 76db129404896c15440b405949b8c830e7ebb98f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
> 2001
> From: Pete Dietl
> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 03:57:06 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] Add arithmetic builtin functions
>
> ---
> src/function.c | 401
> -
> 1 file changed, 400
I apologize for my tardiness in reviewing this patch; it's been a busy
few weeks here.
On Fri, 2024-11-29 at 12:31 -0800, Pete Dietl wrote:
> > Not sure about such inline 'structs'.
>
> These are called "compound literals" and have been part of C since
> C99.
> More broadly though, what is the n
Gisle Vanem wrote:
> > +#define generic_math_op(a, b, op)
> >\
> > + ((void)sizeof (
> >\
> > + char[__builtin_types_compatible_p (typeof (a), typeof (b)) ? 1 :
> > -1]), \
> > + _G
Pete Dietl wrote:
Here I submit to you a patch that adds the following builtin functions
to make: `add` (addition), `sub` (subtraction), `mul`
(multiplication), `div` (division), `mod` (modulus), `max` (maximum),
`min` (minimum), and `abs` (absolute value). The implementation I
provide supports
you all think.
>From 76db129404896c15440b405949b8c830e7ebb98f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pete Dietl
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 03:57:06 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Add arithmetic builtin functions
---
src/function.c | 401 -
1 file changed,
12 matches
Mail list logo
