Hello,
developers causing a "Catch 22" paradox is not new. You want to avoid
such software, or at least work around it with a big margin. Sharply
limiting the use of gnulib here may not provide such a margin and cause
repeated trouble in the future. Your condition of "to those with
trivial-enough
struct child *);
@@ -1616,7 +1617,7 @@
/* If we are running at least one job already and the load average
is too high, make this one wait. */
if (!c->remote
- && ((job_slots_used > 0 && load_too_high ())
+ && ((job_slots_used > 0 &a
memory use.
https://i.imgur.com/9oshAfc.png
On 15/01/2022 10:29, Sven C. Dack wrote:
Hello,
the ChangeLog says the following:
2019-12-17 Paul Smith
...
* src/job.c (load_too_high): Disable Linux /proc/loadavg for now
This new feature has a problem: if you provide a load which is
Hello,
the ChangeLog says the following:
2019-12-17 Paul Smith
...
* src/job.c (load_too_high): Disable Linux /proc/loadavg for now
This new feature has a problem: if you provide a load which is
larger than the number of cores then it will always run every job.
Before we can
On 30/10/17 21:22, Paul Smith wrote:
If we see -j in a makefile setting of MAKEFLAGS, we could:
1. Always silently ignore it (today's behavior).
2. Always print a message then ignore it.
3. Treat it the same way as a recipe with $(MAKE) -j: that is, start a
new jobserver grou
On 30/10/17 07:33, Tim Murphy wrote:
For my money -j is always a top-level setting. To have it per
makefile and then let makefiles depend on that behaviour would open
the door to lots of scary bugs.
Regards,
Tim
Agreed. Using -j in a Makefile is not portable, because it can cause a
sys
I apologise for the mix up. I've pasted the wrong e-mail address into my
response. I meant to say that you will have to be more specific when you
ask on help-m...@gnu.org.
If you could please continue the conversation there, thank you.
On 14/10/17 17:06, Sven C. Dack wrote:
... You
Hello Markus,
you've picked the wrong mailing list. The bug-make@gnu.org is a mailing
list only for discussing bugs and issues with the make program itself.
Please use help-m...@gnu.org for your question.
You can subscribe to help mailing list here:
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/hel
to be read. See here:
http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/index.html
Cheers
On 09/10/17 15:01, Sambhav dutt wrote:
Greetings,
I am completely new to Makefile and I must run linux/unix commands and
not C,CPP at all. I am confused how to start writing a Makefile, like
a
One thought I have here is that the sorting algorithm itself may not
have a significant impact, but hard disk latencies may well make a
difference.
What one sees as an (alphabetically) unordered list may well be an
ordering significant to a file system's performance, meaning, it's not a
compl
igure
script checks for a useable /proc/loadavg file, but the result can be
overwritten manually with --enable-proc-loadavg={yes,no}.
Cheers,
Sven
On 09/10/16 19:58, Sven C. Dack wrote:
Hello,
I have created a patch to improve make's behaviour with regards to
parallel execution and s
Hello Jason,
only judging by the output you've send has the compiler been called with
-Werror and therefore is treating warnings as errors. You may want to
find the flag -Werror in the Makefile and remove it. See if it compiles
with only the warnings.
On 17/08/17 00:53, th...@vmware.com wro
efile sub-z/Makefile
--- Makefile ---
SUBS := $(wildcard sub-*/)
SUB_TARGETS := $(patsubst %,%%,$(SUBS))
$(SUB_TARGETS):
make -C $(dir $@) $(notdir $@)
FOO := "Makefiles"
include Makefile.subs
--- Makefile.subs ---
test-%:
@echo "$(FOO)"
--- sub-a/Makefile ---
FOO := &
and
whatever he wants to do isn't going to work with make, but until then
it's best to keep an open mind, to stay positive and to try to find
something that might work for him and not tell each other whose wrong
and right.
Cheers
On 02/08/17 21:36, Paul Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2017-0
e.
Or am I missing something? We are all adults here, right?
On 02/08/17 20:55, Paul Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 20:40 +0100, Sven C. Dack wrote:
It's my understanding that we don't actually know what Benjamin wants to
do, because nobody has asked. So I don't see how this would m
subdir/test-stem", which is what he will
get when he uses $(eval ...).
Respectfully,
Sven
On 02/08/17 20:12, Kyle Rose wrote:
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Sven C. Dack wrote:
Hello,
try it with the following rules:
test-%: $(eval FOO = BAR)
test-%:
echo $(FOO)
FOO is a globa
Hello,
try it with the following rules:
test-%: $(eval FOO = BAR)
test-%:
echo $(FOO)
$ make test-stem
echo BAR
BAR
$ make subdir/test-stem
echo BAR
BAR
I cannot tell you why it fails in your example. My guess is that it's
just not good practise to use a plain assignment for a prerequisit
Hello,
this is completely normal.
The compiler calls the assembler and linker automatically when needed
and depending on the input files. One doesn't actually call the
assembler and linker manually in most cases. You can do:
cc -c prog.c -o prog.o
This will compile the file &#
Hello Paul,
I was thinking of "--", but didn't test it, because it isn't being
mentioned in the man page nor in the info page.
Cheers
On 22/06/17 13:10, Paul Smith wrote:
On Thu, 2017-06-22 at 13:01 +0100, Sven C. Dack wrote:
You either have to restrict the number
00 | sed 's,^,t,' | xargs -n1000 make -j
which results in:
$ make -j t1 t2 t3 ...
Or if it needs to be unlimited and it has to be numerical arguments can
you simply do this:
$ seq 1000 | xargs -n1000 make -j -C .
which results in:
$ make -j -C . 1 2 3 ...
The -C option tells
A minor correction. I've missed a test for an error case. Updated patch can be
found in the attachments.
Sven
--- make-4.2.1/configure.ac 2016-06-06 13:27:31.0 +0100
+++ make-4.2.1.1/configure.ac 2016-10-09 18:33:34.574257275 +0100
@@ -176,10 +176,30 @@
AS_IF([test "$have_guile"
Hello,
I have created a patch to improve make's behaviour with regards to parallel
execution and system load.
On Linux do the load averages refresh only every 5 seconds. Further do load
averages only ever represent past but not present load. As a consequence does
this lead to idle times duri
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 4:39 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:26:19 -0700
> > From: tom honermann
> > Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
> >
> >
> > On 3/18/2010 2:22 PM, Thiago C. Santini wrote:
> > > Yeah, that was my first thought when usi
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 14:57 -0300, Thiago C. Santini wrote:
> > We have a computer in our lab we use to run simulations and sometimes
> > compiling. It's been working just fine for over 6 months now but
> > during
i686 GNU/Linux
Ubuntu version is 9.04(32 bits) (yeah we do also have a 64 bits version
installed =p)
If any info is needed or I sent this message to the wrong place just let me
know.
Thanks in advance,
--
Thiago C. Santini
ECP/07
___
Bug-make mail
Hi,
In file read.c, the function multi_glob() has #ifndef NO_ARCHIVES code
which I believe has a bug.
Once you enter the large encompassing for loop memname get sets to
either NULL or non-NULL (due to a malloc). Then, entering case 0, i gets
set to gl.gl_patchc, and a while loop churns over
Hi,
In file implicit.c, there seems to be a variable 'remove_explicit_deps'
which, as far as I can tell, serves as a flag to "remove all the
dependencies that didn't come from this implicit rule", as per the
comment in the code.
However, this variable is initialized to 0, then set to 0, then
Hi developers,
I have an issue with make that I am unable to resolve on my own.
My makefile contains an implicit rule as follows:
%.d : %.c
(command to create a .d file from the .c file here)
I also have the VPATH variable set as follows:
VPATH = /d
When I run
Hi there,
When I compile my program, I get this message:
firestarter: error while loading shared
libraries: libpanel_status.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such
file or directory
How can I solve this problem knowing that I downloaded
libpanel_status.so.0?
Big thanks.
__
n in GMAKE ;)
Milan
-Original Message-
From: Johan Bezem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 5:05 AM
To: Bhatt Milan C
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Bug with semicolon in target specific variable?
Semicolons have a special meaning in GNU-make. RTFM!
Escapin
Hello,
It seems GMAKE doesn't like
having semicolons within the value of a target specific
variable.
a : SOME_VAR := c;
d
a :
@echo
$(SOME_VAR)
The above exampe gives me
the following error:
c/bin/sh: d: Execute
permission denied.gmake: *** [a] Error 127
So it prin
ut I'm not
too sure about how POSIX compliant it is.
Thanks,
Milan
-Original Message-
From: Paul D. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 12:06 PM
To: Bhatt, Milan C
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Recursive GMAKE with -j option
%% "Bhatt
Hello,
Has anyone run into
problems when performing recursive GMAKE AND specifying the -j option?
I've noticed that there are no problems with the following:
gmake
-j
when you're doing
recursive gmake. But I run into problems when I specify an integer value
for the -j option:
gmak
This is the manual for GNU make 3.77, May 1998
1) On P 79 (Sec 9.7), looks like '--jobs=[jobs]' should have been
'--jobs[=jobs]'
(I sent this bug also to [EMAIL PROTECTED] since I was not sure where to send
it).
2) By P 43 ( sec 5.7), there have been at least two references to '+'
character
34 matches
Mail list logo
