RE: Static Rules Unceremoniously Dropped

2006-01-31 Thread William Ahern
pattern must match the file name under > consideration, and its prerequisite patterns must name files that exist > or can be made. > ) Hmmm. That explains that, then. Thanx. -- William Ahern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- This message was sca

Static Rules Unceremoniously Dropped

2006-01-31 Thread William Ahern
etc. The only way to trigger it is to remove the rule definition for -lbar. - Bill -- William Ahern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- This message was scanned for Spam, Spyware and Viruses For more information, please visit: http:/

Re: Static Rules Unceremoniously Dropped

2006-01-31 Thread William Ahern
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 14:14 -0800, William Ahern wrote: > Using 3.81beta3, it seems that one of our pattern rules > > CFLAGS_$(d) := -DFOO > > $(d)/%.o: $(d)/%.c -lfoo -lbar > $(CC) $(CFLAGS_$(@D)) ... > Oops. Misprint. I meant "Pattern Rul