Re: PATCH: stack overflow on large dependency set

2002-10-09 Thread Wil Evers
Hi, Paul D. Smith wrote: > I don't think I'll use this exact patch, since putting 0x3 chars on > the stack doesn't seem like a good idea... plus the chance that a rule > needs 0x1 chars for its prerequisites list seems very small to me. Well, the exact amount allocated on the stack is

PATCH: stack overflow on large dependency set

2002-10-09 Thread Wil Evers
, - Wil Wil Evers, DOOSYS R&D, Utrecht, Holland *** make-3.80/commands.cTue Oct 8 16:50:51 2002 --- make/commands.c Wed Oct 9 12:38:16 2002 *** *** 35,40 --- 35,45 #ifndef HAVE_UNISTD_H extern int getpid (); #endif + + #define PLUS_BUF_