Follow-up Comment #8, bug #54854 (group make):
Yep that's it.
I can't believe how I missed this part. So a simple &: would solve the issue
for me?
!!! Wow !!!
Definitely not my brightest moment.
Thanks a lot. Much appreciated.
___
Repl
Follow-up Comment #6, bug #54854 (group make):
Thanks for taking the time to explain with a simple and easy to follow
example.
>From the looks of it I have to agree that this is a legitimate case and cannot
to lead to a broken build.
Unfortunately my case is a rule for a program that builds two
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #54854 (group make):
[comment #3 comment #3:]
> If by "a warning (or a note)" you mean something printed by GNU Make,
instead of content in the documentation (this is already described there) then
no, we can't do that, because this behavior has many uses, and is used in m
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #54854 (project make):
I was also bitten by this.
I understand the argument and why this is not considered a bug.
Would you consider a warning (or a note) if multiple targets (without
patterns) and -j N with N > 1 are used simultaneously?
Thanks
_
