uld be the likelihood of there being a fix to this issue in the
latest 4.0 release?
And, if it is, when might that be possible?
Thanks,
-Tom
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-06-27 at 14:20 -0400, Tom Varga wrote:
>
> > If there is a more approp
o convince gnumake that b.bar1 and
b.bar2 are built with the same rule and MUST be consistent, that is both
having been built at the same time and that both exist too.
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Tom Varga wrote:
>>
&g
On page 120 of the gnumake manual, it mentions support for pattern
rules with multiple targets.
This pattern rule has two targets:
%.tab.c %.tab.h: %.y
bison -d $<
So, if I have a simple rule that looks like:
%.bar1 %.bar2 : %.foo
touch $(*F).bar1
touch $(*F).bar2
and then do:
> touch a.foo
