[bug #16389] Defaults for Objective-C

2007-04-18 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #16389 (project make): I agree with Paul pretty much, however, this patch has been waiting here for quite a while with no real reason, IMO, for not adding it. Being a GNU make only feature is not really an issue, I don't think, there are a whole bunch of GNU make only fe

Re: Objective-C patch *ping*

2006-04-20 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 11:31 -0400, Paul D. Smith wrote: > I don't mind adding support for Objective-C. Why is the suffix for an > Obj-C file .m? Weird. Yes, it is .m, you get used to it :) > Please file an enhancement request on Savannah so we don't lose track of > this. Done. Thank you! Pete

Re: Objective-C patch *ping*

2006-04-19 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Hi, Any comments on this? Peter signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-m

Objective-C patch

2006-04-09 Thread Peter O'Gorman
GNU make. Okay? Should the __APPLE__ checks be removed? Peter Index: ChangeLog 2006-04-10 Peter O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (tiny change) * default.c (default_suffixes, default_suffix_rules, default_variables) [darwin]: Defaults for objective-C. from Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PRO