27;t understand this well enough to know which is the correct behavior
or what the error message is trying to tell me. Is 3.82 working
as expected? Is there some more "correct" way to accomplish the same
result?
Thanks!
--
Peter Fales
Alcatel-Lucent
Member of Technical Staff
1960 Luce
f !defined(HAVE_DECL_SYS_SIGLIST)
Since HAVE_DECL_SYS_SIGLIST is defined (but with value 0), the code
is skipped even though it's needed on this platform.
--
Peter Fales Lucent Technologies, Room 1C-436
N9IYJ 2000 Lucent Ln, PO Box 3033
internet: [