Win32 File Name Compares and Normalization

2001-09-10 Thread Matthew Von-Maszewski
--- /* fill in struct dirent values */ pDir->dir_sdReturn.d_ino = -1; strcpy(pDir->dir_sdReturn.d_name, wfdFindData.cFileName); ! /* mev */ ! strlwr(pDir->dir_sdReturn.d_name); return &pDir->dir_sdReturn; } == Matthe

RE: Pattern Specific Variable Limitation

2001-03-19 Thread Matthew Von-Maszewski
We are in agreement. I do not like it, but I do understand. Thanks again for the time, Matthew -Original Message- From: Paul D. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul D. Smith Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 11:09 AM To: Matthew Von-Maszewski Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE

RE: Pattern Specific Variable Limitation

2001-03-19 Thread Matthew Von-Maszewski
s in the code. I do appreciate your time spent in reviewing and discussing this change. Thanks, Matthew -Original Message- From: Paul D. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul D. Smith Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 9:50 AM To: Matthew Von-Maszewski Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

RE: Pattern Specific Variable Limitation

2001-03-19 Thread Matthew Von-Maszewski
On Behalf Of Paul D. Smith Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2001 10:35 PM To: Matthew Von-Maszewski Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Pattern Specific Variable Limitation %% "Matthew Von-Maszewski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: mv> I found a small, but in my case defeating, limitation

Pattern Specific Variable Limitation

2001-03-18 Thread Matthew Von-Maszewski
temlen+1])) < && p->len >= bestlen) < { < best=p; < bestlen=p->len; < } --- > && (*p->suffix == '\0' || streq (&p->suffix[1], &stem[stemlen+1]))) > break; 626c619 < return best; --- >