Paul Smith skribis:
> On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 08:48 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> In this thread:
>>
>>http://lists.gnutls.org/pipermail/gnutls-devel/2013-September/006453.html
>>
>> and specifically in this message and its followups:
>>
>> http://lists.gnutls.org/pipermail/gnutls-devel/2
Hi,
Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am Sonntag, den 12.08.2007, 09:29 +0200 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
>
>> I'm trying to use the following single-suffix rule:
>>
>> .SUFFIXES = .in
> ^ ^
> I think, you mixed some syntax her
Hi,
"Dave Korn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 12 August 2007 15:07, Ludovic "Courtes" wrote:
>
>
>> Am I missing something
>
> The fact that you already sent this yesterday and it already got answered
> two hours before you resent it?
Indeed. :-)
Apologies for the noise.
(Actually, it t
Hi,
I'm trying to use the following single-suffix rule:
.SUFFIXES = .in
.in:
echo dot-in
My understanding is that the rule should be triggered whenever there
exists a file whose name is equal to the target name plus the `.in'
suffix. For instance, "make foo" should trigger the ru
Hi,
I'm trying to use the following single-suffix rule:
.SUFFIXES = .in
.in:
echo dot-in
My understanding is that the rule should be triggered whenever there
exists a file whose name is equal to the target name plus the `.in'
suffix. For instance, "make foo" should trigger the ru
