Sviđa mi se!
--
Kevin R. Bulgrien
- Original Message -
> From: "Dmitry Goncharov via Bug reports and discussion for GNU make"
>
> To: "Bartol Hrg"
> Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2021 12:25:05 PM
> Subject: Re: Make language
> I plan to bow out of this discussion as I'm not vested in it, but, a
> distinguishing significant functional or interpretive difference
> between these two forms is not self-evident:
>
> 1)
>
>FILE_SIZES := 5 2 1 4
>TOTAL :- $(math +, $(FILE_SIZES))
>
> 2)
>
> FILE_SIZES := 5 2 1 4
> There's something to be said for this being able potentially to work
> - not that I'm pushing it mind:
> FILE_SIZES:= 5 2 1 4
> TOTAL:=$(+ $(FILE_SIZES)) # TOTAL is 5+2+1+4
> Here I'm not objecting to ($math +,$(FILE_SIZES)) or $(op
> +,$(FILE_SIZES)) - whatever on them - I am only trying to po
> Of course we can still do prefix notation with a single function we
> just have to choose a name for it and it's a little less slick; for
> example something like:
>
> $(op + 5 7 $(op * 3 2) 9)
>
> or whatever so the function is named "op" (for example). Or it could
> be named something else
conflict so
future releases do not trigger the same issue. If not, that is fine,
but it would be appreciated.
This is the only source change required to make build on this platform
possible. I realize that this particular platform is far outside of
vendor support, but don't really se
