Re: timestamp resolution

2007-05-11 Thread Joseph M Gwinn
Hans, Hans Aberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/10/2007 09:09:59 AM: > On 9 May 2007, at 16:30, Joseph M Gwinn wrote: > > > In fact, POSIX "Seconds Since the Epoch" is effectively TAI minus an > > unspecified offset because POSIX counts ~SI seconds regardl

Re: timestamp resolution

2007-05-09 Thread Joseph M Gwinn
Hans, Hans Aberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/09/2007 07:51:16 AM: > I made a post to the moderated Usenet newsgroup sci.astro.research, > "Julian day numbers and leap seconds", and there are so many > responses, I cannot summarize them here. > > The question of finding a good time suitable