ult: 'gnumake') used at link time.
Please feel free to edit and apply it.
Thanks,
J.
>From 719d2337933e6e1d699c414a56689e34a00d078a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jannick
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 16:00:54 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 01/13] Windows build: regroup code blocks in build_w32
Hi Eli,
Many thanks for looking into this!
On Sun, 03 Nov 2019 17:35:42 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > From: "Jannick"
> > Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2019 13:30:11 +0100
> >
> > Would it be possible to pass to build_w32.bat in an optional command
> > line argu
Hi,
This is a pure Windows issue:
Would it be possible to pass to build_w32.bat in an optional command line
argument the executable name (currently hard coded in the variable MAKE as
'gnumake')?
When creating a plugin (.dll) with GCC (by linking against gnumake.dll.a)
which should then be called
Hi Jeffrey,
On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 20:55:48 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> I'm trying to build Make 4.2.1 from the release tarball on an antique system.
> I've tried configuring with without a guile option, --without-guile and --
> disable-guile. In each case the tail of configure results in:
> ./co
Hi,
this patch essentially escapes '@' in sample code such that '$@' (instead of
'$') is printed. Patch file attached.
diff --git a/doc/make.texi b/doc/make.texi
index 01bcec7..75c8834 100644
--- a/doc/make.texi
+++ b/doc/make.texi
@@ -11275,7 +11275,6 @@ function in a file @file{mk_temp.c}:
@ex
Hi everybody,
it appears that a $(foreach) statement appearing in any recipe line is
evaluated before all remaining lines regardless where in the recipe it
appears, then all remaining recipe lines are executed. I would expect the
lines to be executed in the order of appearance.
A simple culprit
