RE: A possible bug (or a feature) : dependencies shown in dry-run but not rebuilt

2002-11-14 Thread David Mentre
Hello Mr Smith, > -Original Message- > From: Paul D. Smith [mailto:psmith@;gnu.org] > Sent: mercredi 13 novembre 2002 17:34 > To: David Mentre > dm>Prerequisite `x.h' is newer than target `x.c'.<<<< ok > > No, not OK! > >

RE: A possible bug (or a feature) : dependencies shown in dry-run but not rebuilt

2002-11-13 Thread David Mentre
Hello Mr Smith, > -Original Message- > From: Paul D. Smith [mailto:psmith@;gnu.org] > Sent: mercredi 13 novembre 2002 16:17 > I tried your environment on my Debian GNU/Linux box with GNU > make 3.79.1 > and it worked fine for me: when I ran "make" everything was > rebuilt and > when I r

A possible bug (or a feature) : dependencies shown in dry-run but not rebuilt

2002-11-13 Thread David Mentre
Hello, I don't know if it is a bug or a feature, but I observe a strange behavior with a makefile of my own. You'll find the Makefile as well as needed dummy file in the attachement. For this project, if a make a 'make' on an empty directory, everything is made correctly. However, if I modify a