Tim Landscheidt writes:
> Dan Nicolaescu wrote some time ago:
>
>> I've run into situations where given:
>
>> foo: a b c
>
>> and "b" was missing a dependency on "a".
>
>> The above did not fail with parallel make for years beca
I've run into situations where given:
foo: a b c
and "b" was missing a dependency on "a".
The above did not fail with parallel make for years because "a" finished
fast, before "b" actually needed to use it's result.
It might be interesting to have a make flag that would reverse the order
in wh
Wouldn't it be better if --trace would print the absolute file name?
The current message like:
Makefile:106: target 'all' does not exist
are a bit hard to pin point in a big build system with a lot of
Makefiles in many directories and a lot of parallelism.
___
