Could I know why it got ignored?
--
Sincerely,
Cao jin
On 06/27/2017 03:49 PM, Cao jin wrote:
> When @node "call Function" is outputted in Info format, there are inconsistent
> inconsistent variable names between example and description. @var is used to
> indicate metasynta
this case.
Signed-off-by: Cao jin
---
doc/make.texi | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/make.texi b/doc/make.texi
index 343927b..57c8806 100644
--- a/doc/make.texi
+++ b/doc/make.texi
@@ -7655,7 +7655,7 @@ foo = $(call reverse,a,b)
@end smallexample
Find that I missed more similar case in this node, please ignore this
one, I will send v2.
--
Sincerely,
Cao jin
On 06/21/2017 12:17 PM, Cao jin wrote:
> In chapter 8.7 "The `call' Function" of `info make`, there is inconsistent
> variable name between example and des
s not definitely a mistake, so, this patch maybe should called
"improvement", not "correction"
but anyway, I won't insist my option on this patch, because it is not
something make people confuse.
--
Sincerely,
Cao jin
> On 21 June 2017 at 06:38, Martin Dorey &l
er answers suggest the "were" form is
> getting rarer, so maybe it's a good idea to change it, even though it
> was right before.
I thought it is a grammatical mistake, until you tell me the
"subjunctive", which I really couldn't recall by myself:p
--
Sincerely,
Cao
Feel free to massage the commit message if they are not good.
Cao jin (2):
Trivial correction on document
Consistent variable name make less confusion
doc/make.texi | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
2.1.0
___
Bug
---
doc/make.texi | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/make.texi b/doc/make.texi
index dfa4454..343927b 100644
--- a/doc/make.texi
+++ b/doc/make.texi
@@ -1831,7 +1831,7 @@ more recent than it.
@item
How to update the file @file{foo.o}: by running @code{cc}
In chapter 8.7 "The `call' Function" of `info make`, there is inconsistent
variable name between example and description as following:
This macro simply reverses its arguments:
reverse = $(2) $(1)
foo = $(call reverse,a,b)
Here FOO wi
Hi,
I find some tiny errors in "info make", as a non-developer, I want to
know how to provide the patch? Do you accept patch email via "git
send-email"?
--
Sincerely,
Cao jin
___
Bug-make mailing list
Bug-make@gnu.org
https://l