[bug #14927] Fix for building archive members in parallel

2023-01-03 Thread Alon Blayer-Gat
Follow-up Comment #12, bug #14927 (project make): I think the main confusion arises from not clearly separating storage from target. _make_ does not (and should not) concern itself with the underlying structure that stores the file as long as that storage satisfies certain requirements. Similarly

[bug #14927] Fix for building archive members in parallel

2023-01-02 Thread Alon Blayer-Gat
Follow-up Comment #6, bug #14927 (project make): Took me a bit to reconstruct my 17y old previous response but yes - this is the requirement - on the one hand treating object files as intermediates and on the other doing the minimum required - just the delta. "avoid the library syntax altogether"

[bug #14927] Fix for building archive members in parallel

2007-12-31 Thread Alon Blayer-Gat
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #14927 (project make): Hi, By treating the archive as if it was a file system - it is possible to leave Make 'clean' from specific implementations. AVFS - http://sourceforge.net/projects/avf/ http://directory.fsf.org/project/AVFS : "A Virtual File System lets progra

[bug #14927] Fix for building archive members in parallel

2006-12-25 Thread Alon Blayer-Gat
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #14927 (project make): Following is a way to add objects in parallel with 3.80/81 The main idea - *- depend files are used as sentinels of the object files *- object files which do not have depend files are extracted from the library with their original modification date