Follow-up Comment #6, bug #66500 (group make):
[comment #5 comment #5:]
> The rule for foo/tar is lacking a recipie. In this case make has no reason to
> invalidate the cached mtime of foo/tar. As explained earlier make has no idea
> that the recipie for foo touched foo/tar. Any recipie for foo/ta
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #66500 (group make):
The rule for foo/tar is lacking a recipie. In this case make has no reason to
invalidate the cached mtime of foo/tar. As explained earlier make has no idea
that the recipie for foo touched foo/tar. Any recipie for foo/tar, even a
empty one, is suffici
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #66500 (group make):
[comment #3 comment #3:]
> This statement applies as make is traversing the graph and is considering a
> target. When make is considering baz foo/tar exists and is older.
> This is the typical issue when a recipie builds something other than $@.
Loo
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #66500 (group make):
This statement applies as make is traversing the graph and is considering a
target. When make is considering baz foo/tar exists and is older.
This is the typical issue when a recipie builds something other than $@.
_
