On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 10:30 AM Paul Smith wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2024-06-21 at 09:11 -0400, Dmitry Goncharov wrote:
> > i hope, Paul approves adding tests of this nature.
>
> I have no problems with adding unit tests, as long as we can find a way
> to integrate it into the test suite in a reasonable
On Fri, 2024-06-21 at 09:11 -0400, Dmitry Goncharov wrote:
> i hope, Paul approves adding tests of this nature.
I have no problems with adding unit tests, as long as we can find a way
to integrate it into the test suite in a reasonable way.
But this particular thing doesn't really feel like a "te
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 5:37 PM Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> Glancing at tests/ all the tests exercise user-facing `make` API. What
> would be the best way to validate probabilities?
For this type of code like shuffle, i like testing the function itself,
directly. Just calling the function in a t
