Re: building failure

Thanks for the tip! On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 8:26 PM Martin Dorey < martin.do...@hitachivantara.com> wrote: > An internet search for "No rule to make target debian/-certs.pem > needed by certs/x509_certificate_list" reveals lots of people with similar > trouble, with many suggestions for how to av

[bug #64295] Detect plugin binary compatibility at load time

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #64295 (project make): Paul, i see that you introduced a new parameter to the setup function. This new parameter will cause make to crash (if the user is fortunate) or it will cause some undefined behavior otherwise. >From the users point of view the cause will be difficu

[bug #64295] Detect plugin binary compatibility at load time

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #64295 (project make): This patch implements make abi versioning for loadable plugins. The proposed patch is binary compatible with existing plugins. This patch allows make to detect if a plugin is binary compatible and exit with an error in the case of a binary incompat

[bug #64295] Detect plugin binary compatibility at load time

Additional Item Attachment, bug #64295 (project make): File name: sv64295_detect_plugin_compat.diff Size:12 KB ___ Reply to this item at:

[bug #64295] Detect plugin binary compatibility at load time

URL: Summary: Detect plugin binary compatibility at load time Group: make Submitter: dgoncharov Submitted: Sun 11 Jun 2023 02:36:50 PM UTC Severity: 3 - Normal I

RE: new feature idea: ingesting processed rulesets

Thanks Paul, and also to the others, who have responded to this idea. My problem is that contrary to the make wisdom of writing a single Makefile (to which I agree) most projects are still divided into parts with separate build definitions. One can debate if this is good or bad - for me it is a