On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 15:42:51 -0400
Paul Smith wrote:
> It does look like we need to make a new release soon.
If so, is there anything I can do to get the functionality of my
contributed patch in bug #51200 into the upcoming new release?
Best regards Henrik
__
On 04/04/18 03:42 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 13:03 -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
After all the vibrant discussion I was at least expecting a reply that
says "okay .. so that works" or perhaps a "ver 4.2.2 patches?" or
something.
Well, we thought it would work and it did work, an
On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 13:03 -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> After all the vibrant discussion I was at least expecting a reply that
> says "okay .. so that works" or perhaps a "ver 4.2.2 patches?" or
> something.
Well, we thought it would work and it did work, and those fixes are in
the codebase... s
I would like to propose a new option to the 'make' command
which instructs the software to change the order of execution
of same-level rules according to past success or failure,
in order to reduce average turn-around times in software
development.
Consider a target T, which depends on components
After all the vibrant discussion I was at least expecting a reply that
says "okay .. so that works" or perhaps a "ver 4.2.2 patches?" or
something.
What bothers me is that these patches are only needed on a i686 system
thus far.
Dennis
---
