On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Martin Dorey wrote:
> "It’s very important that you recognize the limited scope in which automatic
> variable values are available: they only have values within the recipe. In
> particular, you cannot use them anywhere within the target list of a rule;
> they ha
Hi Martin,
Le jeudi 03 août 2017 à 16:53 +, Martin Dorey a écrit :
> You're trying to use an automatic variable in a scope where it doesn't
> have the value you want. make -p is how I'd debug such:
>
> martind@swiftboat:~/tmp/benjamin-cama-2017-08-03$ cat Makefile
> SUBDIR = $(@D)
> $(SUBDIR
You're trying to use an automatic variable in a scope where it doesn't have the
value you want. make -p is how I'd debug such:
martind@swiftboat:~/tmp/benjamin-cama-2017-08-03$ cat Makefile
SUBDIR = $(@D)
$(SUBDIR)/target-%:
martind@swiftboat:~/tmp/benjamin-cama-2017-08-03$ make -n -p 2>&1 | gre
Hi Sven,
Le jeudi 03 août 2017 à 16:46 +0100, Sven C. Dack a écrit :
> it's a common practise to create a Makefile for each subdirectory and
> have it include definitions from a parent Makefile. That's probably why
> you don't see that many directory-spanning features in make. It's easier
> to man
Hello Benjamin,
it's a common practise to create a Makefile for each subdirectory and
have it include definitions from a parent Makefile. That's probably why
you don't see that many directory-spanning features in make. It's easier
to manage Makefiles in a structure similar to the source code inst
OK, new subject as this specific behavior gets stranger.
Le jeudi 03 août 2017 à 17:27 +0200, Benjamin Cama a écrit :
> Le jeudi 03 août 2017 à 15:06 +, Edward Welbourne a écrit :
> > Benjamin Cama (3 August 2017 17:00)
> > > Well, I tried:
> > >
> > >SUBDIR = $(dir $@)
> > >$(
Le jeudi 03 août 2017 à 15:06 +, Edward Welbourne a écrit :
> Benjamin Cama (3 August 2017 17:00)
> > Well, I tried:
> >
> >SUBDIR = $(dir $@)
> >$(SUBDIR)/target-%:
> > …
> >
> > But it doesn't work. But without a slash (which is already present at
> > the end of $(SUB
Le jeudi 03 août 2017 à 14:59 +0200, Benjamin Cama a écrit :
> To further enhance my understanding of the “right” usage of Makefiles,
> would you advise me to explicitly specify the subdirectory in the
> target
> definition? Because I feel that counting on pattern rules to match in
> subdirectory i
Le jeudi 03 août 2017 à 09:20 -0400, Kyle Rose a écrit :
> On Aug 3, 2017 9:00 AM, "Benjamin Cama" wrote:
> Anyway, it seems that a global variable would solve my problem, and
> indeed it looks a bit more right this way: I can still get the stem in
> my recipe (with $*), an
On Aug 3, 2017 9:00 AM, "Benjamin Cama" wrote:
Anyway, it seems that a global variable would solve my problem, and
indeed it looks a bit more right this way: I can still get the stem in
my recipe (with $*), and everything works as expected. It's just that
the global namespace is “polluted” by thi
Hi Paul,
Le mercredi 02 août 2017 à 15:16 -0400, Paul Smith a écrit :
> On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 20:03 +0100, Sven C. Dack wrote:
> > On 02/08/17 11:19, Benjamin Cama wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I may be doing something wrong, but the following Makefile gives me
> > > strange results: the target-sp
11 matches
Mail list logo
