[bug #51306] Checking programming possibilities around “MAKECMDGOALS”

URL: Summary: Checking programming possibilities around “MAKECMDGOALS” Project: make Submitted by: elfring Submitted on: Sat 24 Jun 2017 10:22:36 PM CEST Severity: 3 - Normal

Re: Replacing suffix rules in make scripts?

> Why do I get such an error message for a parallel software build attempt > when the specified dependencies worked as expected for the non-parallel > build try before? How do you think about the corresponding update suggestion “Improve some dependency specifications in make rules”? https://github

Re: [bug #49844] 'make -j' without explicit process count sometimes doesn't parallelize

Paul D. Smith writes: > Even simpler is to just use "--" (and what's the goal of using xargs?): > > +verbose+ > make -j5 -- $(seq 1000) > > make -j -- $(seq 1000) > -verbose- Hi. Yes, the above is what I intended, and clearly this isn't a bug. Thanks for looking at it, and sorry for the noi