Paul Smith-20 wrote
> Before you go too far with performance improvements you should really
> move to the latest version of GNU make (4.2.1) or even try the current
> Git HEAD (but you'll need to install autotools etc. to build from Git).
>
> It's less useful to be doing performance testing with a
Before you go too far with performance improvements you should really
move to the latest version of GNU make (4.2.1) or even try the current
Git HEAD (but you'll need to install autotools etc. to build from Git).
It's less useful to be doing performance testing with a version of make
that old.
O
Hi everybody,
I'm currently refactoring the build system at my company. We got around 20k
C++ source files, and we use a form of (messed up) recursive make. After a
lot of tinkering to get things right I got to 10 (maybe 5 with some more
massage) seconds for a clean build. I need something around
On Sun, 2017-03-19 at 01:51 +, Alejandro García Vallejo wrote:
> bar: $(@:%r=foo%z)
> @echo End
>
> foobaz:
> @echo The
>
> """
> GNU Make Output:
> End
>
> Make fails to read $@ (aka, it's empty).
That's not a bug; that's defined behavior. From the GNU make manual:
https:
Hi,
(NOTE: For details on versions used and whatnot see the end of the e-mail,
should apply to all of them, AFAIK.)
I know that this is a corner case, but given a Makefile such as this one:
"""
Makefile
"""
bar: $(@:%r=foo%z)
@echo End
foobaz:
@echo The
"""
GNU Make Output:
End
