On Mon Jan 12 19:11:20 2015, elfr...@users.sourceforge.net (SF Markus Elfring)
wrote:
> > You can use "gmake --print-database -f Makefile" and then write a script
> > to convert that into .dot format which gephi will load up for you.
>
> Do you know a few scripts (or other software tools) which p
> You can use "gmake --print-database -f Makefile" and then write a script
> to convert that into .dot format which gephi will load up for you.
Do you know a few scripts (or other software tools) which provide such
a data format conversion?
Will it become easier to present and edit an overview of
This is generally a hopeless thing to do because the graphs become enormous
spiderwebs.
Gephi is good enough to do large makefiles without crashing or slowing down
to a stop.
You can use "gmake --print-database -f Makefile" and then write a script
to convert that into .dot format which gephi wi
Hello,
Make files can grow to a size (with all their build rules
and various script code) where it becomes harder to follow
the involved data processing structures.
Do you know any software tools which provide graphical
visualisations for work flows that were developed with
the make file syntax?
On Mon Jan 12 13:14:02 2015, elfr...@users.sourceforge.net (SF Markus Elfring)
wrote:
> > GNU make is the only implementation of make that supports any GNU
> > make functions, including $(eval ...), if that's what you mean.
>
> I hope that more software tools can cope with make file syntax and
>
> Make implementations are notorious for having lots of incompatible
> extensions. That's because the POSIX standard for make (which all
> implementations typically adhere to) is very limited in what it
> requires, so implementations have added their own features in addition
> to the standard, and
On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 13:14 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > GNU make is the only implementation of make that supports any GNU
> > make functions, including $(eval ...), if that's what you mean.
>
> I hope that more software tools can cope with make file syntax and
> processing of corresponding
> GNU make is the only implementation of make that supports any GNU
> make functions, including $(eval ...), if that's what you mean.
I hope that more software tools can cope with make file syntax and
processing of corresponding GNU extensions.
> In fact, recursive variable expansion is about th
